Re: Potential reference miscounts and segfaults in plpython.c

From: Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Potential reference miscounts and segfaults in plpython.c
Date: 2012-02-20 10:05:43
Message-ID: 4F421AF7.1080308@wulczer.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 20/02/12 04:29, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIFVyYmHFhHNraQ==?= <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> writes:
>>> On 18/02/12 21:17, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> Dave Malcolm at Red Hat has been working on a static code analysis tool
>>>> for Python-related C code. He reports here on some preliminary results
>>>> for plpython.c:
>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795011
>
>> Here's a patch that fixes everything I was sure was an actual bug. The
>> rest of the warnings seem to be caused by the tool not knowing that
>> elog(ERROR) throws a longjmp and things like "we never unref this
>> object, so it can't disappear mid-execution".
>
> My only comment is whether elog(ERROR) is appropriate, ie, do we consider
> these to be internal errors that users will never see in practice?

AFAICS these errors can only happen on out of memory conditions or other
internal errors (like trying to create a list with a negative length).

Cheers,
Jan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Itagaki Takahiro 2012-02-20 12:30:13 array_to_json re-encodes ARRAY of json type
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2012-02-20 09:18:44 Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2