| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: When do we lose column names? |
| Date: | 2012-02-15 04:44:23 |
| Message-ID: | 4F3B3827.7040803@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/14/2012 05:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> OK, I fixed this up and committed it. I made some cosmetic changes
> (the most notable being that the definition of RowExpr is really
> changing here, and so should its comment). The adjust_appendrel_attrs
> situation was fixed by passing in the PlannerInfo, which is something
> that probably should have been made available all along --- there are
> very few nontrivial functions in the planner that don't need it.
Great, many thanks for finishing this up.
>
> I'm still a bit annoyed by the behavior I mentioned here,
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-11/msg01031.php
> that we don't get "real" column names from an unflattened VALUES RTE.
> Might be worth looking into that, but I don't have time for it.
>
>
A TODO maybe?
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2012-02-15 05:23:04 | Re: client performance v.s. server statistics |
| Previous Message | Zhou Han | 2012-02-15 03:59:36 | client performance v.s. server statistics |