Re: Planet posting policy

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Planet posting policy
Date: 2012-02-02 04:15:14
Message-ID: 4F2A0DD2.7020400@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On 2/1/12 11:27 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Agreed. Which is why it's interesting that those posting in favor of
> allowing more "commercially oriented" posts are the people who either
> have commercial products they'd consider blogging about or have
> previous been asked to remove at least one post from the planet... At
> least AFAICT, forgive me if I got one wrong or so, but the majority is
> certainly that way...

Yes, although I'll point out that the post I got removed was one which
would still be prohibited under my suggested new policy.

Personally, I really do think two feeds is the only answer ...

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2012-02-02 22:26:14 AustinPUG mailing List: Password/Controlpanel access?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-02-02 00:55:47 Re: Planet posting policy