| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Group commit, revised |
| Date: | 2012-01-30 20:04:24 |
| Message-ID: | 4F26F7C8.1020404@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 30.01.2012 21:55, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 30.01.2012 17:18, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
>>> Peter and I have been working on a new version that seems likely to
>>> improve performance over your suggestions. We should be showing
>>> something soon.
>>
>> Please post those ideas, and let's discuss them. If it's something simple,
>> maybe we can still sneak them into this release. Otherwise, let's focus on
>> the existing patches that are pending review or commit.
>
> If you really did want to discuss it, it would have taken you 5
> minutes to check whether there was consensus on the patch before
> committing it. Your actions betray the opposite of a willingness to
> discuss anything.
>
> Yes, I'd like to discuss ideas, not just ram home a half-discussed and
> half-finished patch that happens to do things the way you personally
> prefer, overriding all inputs.
>
> Especially when you know we're working on another version.
Sorry. So, what's the approach you're working on?
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-01-30 20:24:25 | Re: CLOG contention, part 2 |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-01-30 19:55:07 | Re: Group commit, revised |