| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: reprise: pretty print viewdefs |
| Date: | 2012-01-16 15:43:41 |
| Message-ID: | 4F1445AD.2030209@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/13/2012 02:50 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 01/13/2012 12:31 AM, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
>> So my conclusion is it's better than nothing, but we could do
>> better job here.
>
>> From timeline perspective, it'd be ok to apply this patch and improve
>> more later in 9.3+.
>
>
> I agree, let's look at the items other than the target list during
> 9.3. But I do think this addresses the biggest pain point.
Actually, it turns out to be very simple to add wrapping logic for the
FROM clause, as in the attached updated patch, and I think we should do
that for this round.
cheers
andrew
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| viewdef2.patch | text/x-patch | 16.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-01-16 15:44:57 | Re: inconsistent comparison of CHECK constraints |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-01-16 15:27:03 | Re: age(xid) on hot standby |