Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: automating CF submissions (was xlog location arithmetic)

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: automating CF submissions (was xlog location arithmetic)
Date: 2012-01-15 08:37:30
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 01/15/2012 03:17 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> And FWIW, I'd find it a lot more useful for the CF app to have the
> ability to post *reviews* in it, that would end up being properly
> threaded.

Next you'll be saying we should have some sort of web application to 
help with the whole review process, show the work on an integrated sort 
of Review Board or something.  What crazy talk.

My contribution toward patch review ease for this week is that peg is 
quite a bit smarter about referring to the correct part of the origin 
git repo now, when you've been working on a branch for a while then 
create a new one:

Last week's was that I confirmed that on a Mac using Homebrew for 
package management, after "brew install postgresql" to get the 
dependencies in, you can then use peg to setup a PostgreSQL in your home 
directory for patch testing or development.  Works fine out of the box, 
you just won't have things like all the PLs installed.

Yes, I am aware I'm going at this bottom-up.

Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2012-01-15 08:45:25
Subject: Re: automating CF submissions (was xlog location arithmetic)
Previous:From: Peter GeogheganDate: 2012-01-15 08:25:46
Subject: Re: Our poll() based WaitLatch implementation is broken

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group