Re: CLOG contention

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: CLOG contention
Date: 2012-01-05 16:35:29
Message-ID: 4F057CF102000025000443F3@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>> So it seems that at least on this machine, increasing the number
>> of CLOG buffers both improves performance and reduces latency.
>
> I believed before that the increase was worthwhile and now even
> more so.
>
> Let's commit the change to 32.

+1

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Mlodgenski 2012-01-05 16:38:21 Client Messages
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-01-05 16:13:16 Re: FATAL: bogus data in lock file "postmaster.pid": ""