Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches
Date: 2011-12-28 14:08:22
Message-ID: 4EFB22D6.9060508@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/28/2011 08:43 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 14:38, Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/27/2011 11:09 PM, Brar Piening wrote:
>>> Brar Piening wrote:
>>>> I have to admit that it's currently broken (it builds but fails during
>>>> regression tests becuse it can't connect) when building with Visual Studio
>>>> 2010 or Windows SDK 7.1 because of commit
>>>> 1a0c76c32fe470142d3663dd84ac960d75a4e8db (Enable compiling with the
>>>> mingw-w64 32 bit compiler).
>>>>
>>>> It seems like VS 2010 has a few of the E... constants in
>>>> src/include/port/win32.h already defined, but obviously in a way that breaks
>>>> postgres.
>>>>
>>>> Because of my missing experience and as I don't have a Mingw64 build
>>>> environment I don't feel like I could fix that without breaking anythig
>>>> else.
>>>
>>> I'd like to add that I'm certainly willing to test suggested fixes or
>>> patches in my VS 2010 build environment.
>>>
>>>
>> Can you narrow down exactly what in that commit broke VS 2010? Are there any
>> compiler warnings?
> He did post the commit - 1a0c76c32fe470142d3663dd84ac960d75a4e8db.

I realize that. I'm asking him to narrow it down more.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2011-12-28 14:11:24 Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2011-12-28 13:43:19 Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches