Re: reprise: pretty print viewdefs

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: reprise: pretty print viewdefs
Date: 2011-12-22 23:11:23
Message-ID: 4EF3B91B.5080004@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/22/2011 02:17 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 12/22/2011 01:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Maybe, though I fear it might complicate the ruleutils code a bit.
>> You'd probably have to build the output for a column first and then
>> see how long it is before deciding whether to insert a newline.
>>
>> In short, I don't mind trying to make this work better, but I think it
>> will take more work than a two-line patch.
>>
>>
>
> OK. Let me whip something up. I had already come to the conclusion you
> did about how best to do this.
>
>

Here's a WIP patch. At least it's fairly localized, but as expected it's
rather more than 2 lines :-). Sample output:

regression=# \pset format unaligned
Output format is unaligned.
regression=# select pg_get_viewdef('shoelace',true);
pg_get_viewdef
SELECT s.sl_name, s.sl_avail, s.sl_color, s.sl_len, s.sl_unit,
s.sl_len * u.un_fact AS sl_len_cm
FROM shoelace_data s, unit u
WHERE s.sl_unit = u.un_name;
(1 row)
regression=#

I just had an idea. We could invent a flavor of pg_get_viewdef() that
took an int as the second param, that would be the wrap width. For the
boolean case as above, 80 would be implied. 0 would mean always wrap.
psql could be made to default to the window width, or maybe window width
- 1, but we could provide a psql setting that would override it.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-12-22 23:14:46 Re: reprise: pretty print viewdefs
Previous Message Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson 2011-12-22 22:44:34 Re: Typed hstore proposal