Re: GiST for range types (was Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor)

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GiST for range types (was Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor)
Date: 2011-12-10 14:14:09
Message-ID: 4EE36931.9040207@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/02/2011 06:48 AM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> Rebased with head.

Could you comment a little more on what changed? There were a couple of
areas Tom commented on:

-General code fixes
-"pull out and apply the changes related to the RANGE_CONTAIN_EMPTY
flag, and also remove the <> opclass entry"
-Subdiff issues

The third one sounded hard to deal with, so presumably nothing there.
I'm not sure if your updated rebase addresses either of those first two
yet or not, or if it was just fixing bitrot from upstream code changes.

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2011-12-10 14:50:12 Re: [PATCH] Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v3
Previous Message Greg Smith 2011-12-10 13:56:55 Re: pg_stat_statements with query tree based normalization