| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only |
| Date: | 2011-12-09 03:30:27 |
| Message-ID: | 4EE180D3.2000601@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/8/11 9:18 PM, Joachim Wieland wrote:
> If you ask pg_restore to restore a section out of an archive which
> doesn't have this section, there is no error and the command just
> succeeds. This is what I expected and I think it's the right thing to
> do but maybe others think that
> there should be a warning.
Andrew and I discussed this previously. It's consistent with how we
treat other options in pg_restore. It may be that we should be
consistently treating all options differently, but I don't think that's
specific to this patch.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Shulgin | 2011-12-09 11:03:32 | Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq |
| Previous Message | Joachim Wieland | 2011-12-09 02:18:03 | Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only |