| From: | ben hockey <neonstalwart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE |
| Date: | 2011-12-06 22:15:16 |
| Message-ID: | 4EDE93F4.2060205@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
i may have spoken a little too soon about the format being right... i
just took a look at the postgres source code and it would need one more
change to completely meet my needs. EncodeDateTime should put a 'Z' for
UTC timezone rather than '+0'. with this being the case, do you think
there would need to be an ECMA datestyle or would XSD be compatible with
this change?
i haven't touched any c code in quite a while but the changes look
simple enough that i could work towards an ECMA patch if that's the best
way to go about this.
thanks,
ben...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2011-12-06 22:24:50 | Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE |
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2011-12-06 21:39:38 | PostgreSQL 9.1 poster picture ? |