Re: [REVIEW] Patch for cursor calling with named parameters

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Yeb Havinga" <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Patch for cursor calling with named parameters
Date: 2011-12-06 16:58:53
Message-ID: 4EDDF56D0200002500043914@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>> I personally tend to believe it doesn't even need to be an error.
>> There is no technical reason not to allow it. All the user needs
>> to do is make sure that the combination of named parameters and
>> the positional ones together are complete and not overlapping.

> If there are no objections, I suggest that Yeb implement the mixed
> notation for cursor parameters.

Hearing no objections -- Yeb, are you OK with doing this, and do you
feel this is doable for this CF?

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-12-06 17:06:09 Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-12-06 16:49:03 Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation