Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Christopher Browne" <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jeroen Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "Pg Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt
Date: 2011-11-10 20:29:44
Message-ID: 4EBBDFD80200002500042D09@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> There's value in having an "immutability" constraint on a column,
> where, in effect, you're not allowed to modify the value of the
> column, once assigned.

+1 We would definitely use such a feature, should it become
available.

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2011-11-10 20:38:41 Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-11-10 20:24:55 Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing