Re: 9.1.2 ?

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Greg Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 9.1.2 ?
Date: 2011-11-09 18:38:35
Message-ID: 4EBAC8AB.4090503@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/09/2011 01:12 PM, Greg Jaskiewicz wrote:
> Would you consider it a blocker for a rollout on production system ?

I wouldn't. Good process for checking your backups should find this
problem if it pops up, and it's not that easy to run into. That's why I
was saying there are workarounds here, they're just not nice to put
people through.

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us

In response to

  • Re: 9.1.2 ? at 2011-11-09 18:12:30 from Greg Jaskiewicz

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2011-11-09 18:42:53 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: In COPY, insert tuples to the heap in batches.
Previous Message Greg Jaskiewicz 2011-11-09 18:29:12 Re: const correctness