| From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 9.1.2 ? |
| Date: | 2011-11-09 01:31:41 |
| Message-ID: | 4EB9D7FD.205@2ndQuadrant.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/08/2011 07:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't recall that we've fixed anything since September that seemed to
> warrant an immediate release.
>
The backup+pg_clog failure issues fixed last week have been a nasty
problem hitting people for a while. Backup corruption is obviously
serious. Only reason I think it wasn't a higher priority issue is that
it didn't happen every time, and the people impacted were eventually
able to work around it. Concern about that problem is why I popped off
a message earlier today, about whether the fixes committed have been
confirmed outside of Simon's own testing.
I was curious how 9.0 fared last year for comparison, here's that data:
Version Date Days Weeks
9.0.0 09/20/10
9.0.1 10/04/10 14 2.0
9.0.2 12/16/10 73 10.4
9.0.3 01/31/11 46 6.6
9.0.4 04/18/11 77 11.0
9.0.5 09/26/11 161 23.0
So the average for the first three point releases was around 6 weeks apart.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-11-09 02:17:26 | Re: Materialized views |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2011-11-09 01:31:08 | Re: Materialized views |