Re: DatumGetInetP buggy

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Leonardo Bispo de Oliveira <leonardo(dot)oliveira(at)voipfuture(dot)com>
Subject: Re: DatumGetInetP buggy
Date: 2011-11-08 20:52:43
Message-ID: 4EB9969B.7010609@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08.11.2011 20:46, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> 2011-11-08 18:53 keltezéssel, Heikki Linnakangas írta:
>> What do people think of backpatching this? I'm inclined to backpatch, on the grounds
>> that the macro that detoasts and depacks should always work (ie. after this patch), even
>> if the depacking isn't necessary and introduces an extra palloc+copy, but the reverse is
>> not true.
>
> On the grounds that 9.0.x also shows the problem with
> the stock macro, backporting would be nice. I don't know
> which older trees may show the problem, I only tested with
> 9.0 and 9.1.

Packed varlenas were introduced in 8.3 - this hasn't changed since then.
Committed and backpatched all the way to 8.3.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2011-11-08 20:56:14 Releasing an alpha for CF2
Previous Message Greg Jaskiewicz 2011-11-08 19:46:44 9.1.2 ?