Re: [PATCH] optional cleaning queries stored in pg_stat_statements

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To:
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] optional cleaning queries stored in pg_stat_statements
Date: 2011-11-07 15:27:46
Message-ID: 4EB7F8F2.1070608@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/07/2011 09:03 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think it's an established principle that the design for features
> like this should, for best results, be discussed on -hackers before
> writing a lot of code.

You can see from the commit history this idea is less than a month old.
Do we need to get community approval before writing a proof of concept
now? Everyone would still be arguing about how to get started had that
path been taken. If feedback says this needs a full rewrite, fine. We
are familiar with how submitting patches works here.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2011-11-07 15:37:30 Re: synchronous commit vs. hint bits
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2011-11-07 15:25:20 Re: synchronous commit vs. hint bits