Re: superusers are members of all roles?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: superusers are members of all roles?
Date: 2011-11-02 19:27:28
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09/11/2011 09:40 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 09/09/2011 11:34 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Bruce Momjian<bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Is this a TODO?
>>> I think so.
>> Added to TODO:
>> Address problem where superusers are assumed to be members of all
>> groups
> This turns out to be a one-liner.

Patch with a small docs addition also. Adding to Nov commitfest.



Attachment Content-Type Size
nosuperhbagroup.patch text/x-patch 1.6 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2011-11-02 19:29:31 Re: GiST for range types (was Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-11-02 19:18:35 Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem