Re: IDLE in transaction introspection

From: Jeroen Vermeulen <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Scott Mead <scottm(at)openscg(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: IDLE in transaction introspection
Date: 2011-11-01 14:37:05
Message-ID: 4EB00411.10702@xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2011-11-01 21:13, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> Rename it please. "current_query" will just be wrong. I'd be inclined
> just to call it "query" or "query_string" and leave it to the docs to
> define the exact semantics.

I think "query" for a query that isn't ongoing would be just as wrong.
How about "last_query"?

Jeroen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-11-01 14:40:22 Re: IDLE in transaction introspection
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2011-11-01 14:35:39 Re: Avoiding shutdown checkpoint at failover