Re: [REVIEW] Patch for cursor calling with named parameters

From: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Royce Ausburn <royce(dot)ml(at)inomial(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Patch for cursor calling with named parameters
Date: 2011-10-17 08:44:38
Message-ID: 4E9BEAF6.6000001@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2011-10-15 07:41, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeb Havinga<yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Hello Royce,
>> Thanks again for testing.
> I looked this patch over but concluded that it's not ready to apply,
> mainly because there are too many weird behaviors around error
> reporting.

Tom, thanks for reviewing - getting the syntax errors to be at the exact
location was indeed something that I thought would be near impossible,
however the whitespace suggestion together with the others you made seem
like a good path to go forward. Thanks for taking the time to write your
comments, it will be a great help with making an improved version.

regards,
Yeb Havinga

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Urbański 2011-10-17 08:51:15 Re: proposal: set GUC variables for single query
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2011-10-17 08:38:12 Re: GiST for range types (was Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor)