| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki(at)jp(dot)freebsd(dot)org>, greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: patch for new feature: Buffer Cache Hibernation |
| Date: | 2011-10-14 11:31:43 |
| Message-ID: | 4E981D9F.5090909@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 14.10.2011 11:44, Cédric Villemain wrote:
> 2011/10/14 Bruce Momjian<bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:
>>
>> Should this be marked as TODO?
>
> I suppose TODO items *are* wanted and so working on them should remove
> the pain to convince people here to accept the feature, aren't they ?
I don't think this is worthwhile to have in the backend. Someone could
write it as an extension on pgfoundry, but I don't think that belongs on
the TODO.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-10-14 11:51:21 | Re: loss of transactions in streaming replication |
| Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2011-10-14 11:12:53 | VACUUM touching file but not updating relation |