| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Dumping roles improvements? |
| Date: | 2011-10-12 19:16:29 |
| Message-ID: | 4E95E78D.3040209@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/11/11 9:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't find this terribly convincing. I can see the rationales for two
> endpoint cases: (1) restore these objects into exactly the same
> ownership/permissions environment that existed before, and (2) restore
> these objects with the absolute minimum of ownership/permissions
> assumptions. The latter case seems to me to be covered already by
> --no-owner --no-privileges.
But what I'm asking for is (1). The problem is that the roles don't
ship in the per-database pgdump file.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-10-12 19:17:54 | Re: [v9.2] Object access hooks with arguments support (v1) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-10-12 18:52:54 | Re: [BUGS] *.sql contrib files contain unresolvable MODULE_PATHNAME |