| From: | Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrea Suisani <sickpig(at)opinioni(dot)net>, daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [OT?] Time-zone database down [was: Re: timezone buglet?] |
| Date: | 2011-10-08 15:16:42 |
| Message-ID: | 4E90695A.9040300@mark.mielke.cc |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/07/2011 11:02 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
> All that said I think this is far murkier than you all seem to think.
> Copyright law is one of the most complex areas of the law and this is
> one of the least well defined parts of copyright law.
Hi Greg:
I don't think "we all" think this issue is clear. Quoting relevant case
law and considering what position to hold or what action to take is what
I would call due diligence. If somebody wants to hire a lawyer that
might be advisable as well.
I think "wait and see whether this is a true violation" is a perfectly
valid legal position to hold and is not pretending in any way that this
issue is "clear"...
--
Mark Mielke<mark(at)mielke(dot)cc>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Cédric Villemain | 2011-10-08 15:28:55 | Re: Intermittent regression test failure from index-only scans patch |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-10-08 15:04:56 | Intermittent regression test failure from index-only scans patch |