| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Joe Abbate <jma(at)freedomcircle(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? |
| Date: | 2011-09-19 16:33:39 |
| Message-ID: | 4E776EE3.1090206@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/19/2011 12:20 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:58:49AM -0400, Joe Abbate wrote:
>> On 09/19/2011 09:50 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> FWIW, the fact that the drafts *are* confidential is symptomatic
>>> of everything which is wrong with the ISO.
>> Maybe it's time for an open source SQL standard, one not controlled
>> by the "big guys" and their IP claims.
> That's probably not a bad idea. The down side is that it'll be the work
> of decades, not years, to get this thing going.
>
>
Frankly, whether or not it might be desirable, it strikes me as probably
simply tilting at windmills.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2011-09-19 16:40:29 | Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? |
| Previous Message | Florian Pflug | 2011-09-19 16:32:44 | Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor |