Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?

From: Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
Date: 2011-09-16 13:26:55
Message-ID: 4E734E9F.4060900@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki,

On 16.09.2011 08:49, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
> Even if you can't share drafts, would it be possible to give a summary
> of things that are being discussed in the committee? That way if
> there's people in the community with interests in particular topics,
> they could contact you and get involved.

Of course it is. I just not wanted to spam hackers.

> FWIW, I'm very glad you're on the committee! Even though I have no
> idea what's going on there, it gives me a warm feeling that there's
> someone on the committee who knows PostgreSQL. If someone proposes
> something that would hurt PostgreSQL, like syntax that we already use
> for something else, I know you're going to speak up.
>

Thanks for the bouquet. This comment let me feel better.

Susanne

--
Susanne Ebrecht - 2ndQuadrant
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2011-09-16 13:30:30 Re: fstat vs. lseek
Previous Message Andrea Suisani 2011-09-16 13:19:07 Re: fstat vs. lseek