| From: | Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2 |
| Date: | 2011-09-10 19:59:08 |
| Message-ID: | 4E6BC18C.3080105@squeakycode.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/10/2011 02:52 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tis, 2011-09-06 at 11:41 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> I think the alphas have been extremely valuable for testing.
>
> That's not my recollection. Obviously, it's hard to measure this one
> way or the other, but I don't recall there being a lot of test reports
> from people who are not already contributors and could have used some
> other way to get the code.
>
>
As a tester, I'll pull from git. I like a quick update from git pull.
When I'm playing with patches, its a simple:
git reset --hard
patch < ...
I can't speak for others, but I find no benefit from a packaged alpha release.
-Andy
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2011-09-10 20:07:09 | Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2 |
| Previous Message | Joshua Berkus | 2011-09-10 19:57:40 | Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2 |