Re: Transforming IN (...) to ORs, volatility

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Transforming IN (...) to ORs, volatility
Date: 2011-09-06 17:54:29
Message-ID: 4E665E55.60209@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06.09.2011 20:53, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian<bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>>> Uh, have we addressed this? I don't think so.
>>
>> No. IIRC, I didn't like Heikki's proposed patch, so it's on my head
>> to come up with something better.
>
> You can blame me for getting it into the parser. It used to be in
> gram.y!

Huh? Isn't "the parser" and "gram.y" more or less the same thing?
Anyway, it needs to be somewhere else..

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-09-06 17:58:15 Re: Transforming IN (...) to ORs, volatility
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-09-06 17:53:13 Re: Transforming IN (...) to ORs, volatility