Re: SSI 2PC coverage

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SSI 2PC coverage
Date: 2011-08-18 14:12:43
Message-ID: 4E4D1DDB.3030408@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 18.08.2011 17:07, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> On 07.07.2011 18:43, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>>> OK. I'll work on this tonight unless Dan jumps in to claim it.
>
>> Committed. I removed the second expected output file, and marked the
>> prepared-transactions tests in the schedule as "ignore" instead. That
>> way if max_prepared_transactions=0, you get a notice that the test case
>> failed, but pg_regress still returns 0 as exit status.
>
> Why did you only commit on 9.1 branch?

I did "git push origin master REL9_1_STABLE", and didn't notice that it
failed on master. Rebased and pushed, thanks!

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-08-18 14:12:56 Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-08-18 14:07:41 Re: SSI 2PC coverage