Reports from SSD purgatory

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Reports from SSD purgatory
Date: 2011-08-15 23:49:52
Message-ID: 4E49B0A0.2060705@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

News update for anyone else who's trapped like me, waiting for a fix to
the Intel 320 SSD bug where they can truncate themselves to 8MB. Over
the weekend Intel has announced a firmware fix for the problem is done,
and is due to ship "within the next two weeks":
http://communities.intel.com/thread/24121

On the larger SSD reliability front, Tom's Hardware surveyed heavy SSD
users they're friendly with who use Intel drives. The most interesting
data came from Softlayer:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-reliability-failure-rate,2923-6.html

This supports two claims I made before based on my private data that
were controversial:

-Annualized SSD failure rates are not significantly lower than
traditional drives in the first couple of years. Jury is still out on
whether they will spike upwards starting at 3 years as mechanical ones do.

-The most common source of dead drives is sudden, catastrophic
electronics failure. These are not predicted by SMART, and have nothing
to do with hitting the drive's wear limits.

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Boreham 2011-08-16 04:13:51 Re: Reports from SSD purgatory
Previous Message Greg Smith 2011-08-15 20:36:49 Re: strange pgbench results (as if blocked at the end)