Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches

From: Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches
Date: 2011-07-07 22:35:57
Message-ID: 4E1634CD.90901@gmx.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Review of VS 2010 support patches
From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>
Date: 07.07.2011 16:44

>
> Frankly, I suggest leaving these tests for the buildfarm to sort out.
> I don't see any sign of build process issues; they all build fine, and
> it's pretty darn unlikely that build changes would cause them to break
> at runtime. Windows buildfarm coverage looks pretty decent these days.

As I had no Idea whether the buildfarm is even ready to work with VS
2010 I set out and tested it.

I can happily tell you that I have just now completed my first
successful buildfarm run using the attached build-farm.conf

Regards,

Brar

Attachment Content-Type Size
build-farm.conf text/plain 9.6 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jun Ishiduka 2011-07-08 01:22:20 Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
Previous Message Noah Misch 2011-07-07 22:35:28 Re: [v9.2] Fix leaky-view problem, part 2