Re: BUG #6092: specific casting required for gist indexing of bigint

From: Jeff Frost <jeff(at)pgexperts(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #6092: specific casting required for gist indexing of bigint
Date: 2011-07-06 17:14:41
Message-ID: 4E149801.40507@pgexperts.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 07/05/11 17:06, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jeff Frost" <jeff(at)pgexperts(dot)com> writes:
>> Ran into a situation with a customer who is using the btree_gist contrib
>> module to allow combined index of some tsearch data and two other columns.
>> One of these other columns is a bigint field. I noticed that the combined
>> index won't be used by the planner unless you specifically cast the bare
>> number to a bigint.
> If memory serves, the btree_gist opclasses don't include any cross-type
> operators, so "int8 = int4" doesn't work here.
>
Ah! And if you look at the contrib/btree_gist/sql/int8.sql test file, you'll
see this:

SELECT count(*) FROM int8tmp WHERE a < 464571291354841::int8;

So, I'd say it's expected behavior even though it's slightly counter intuitive
if you're used to the auto typing behavior.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-07-06 17:25:53 Re: Re: PG regression with row comparison when btree_gist is enabled (BUG)
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2011-07-06 17:00:11 Re: Re: PG regression with row comparison when btree_gist is enabled (BUG)