From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed |
Date: | 2011-06-28 15:05:10 |
Message-ID: | 4E09EDA6.1000601@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 06/28/2011 10:39 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> We discussed earlier to potentially block the creation, and removal,
>> of branches on the origin server, to prevent mistakes like this. It
>> has only happened once in almost a year, so it's probably not
>> necessary - but I wanted to raise the option anyway in case people
>> forgot about it.
>> The downside would be that in order to create or drop a branch *when
>> intended* a committer would need someone from the infrastructure team
>> to temporarily switch off the branch-blocking setting, and then back
>> on..
> I think it would be sensible to block branch removal, as there's
> basically never a scenario where we'd do that during current usage.
> I'm not excited about blocking branch addition, although I worry
> sooner or later somebody will accidentally push a private development
> branch :-(. Is it possible to block only removal and not addition?
>
>
+1. Spurious branch addition shouldn't cause us much pain - we'd just
remove the new branch. Unwanted deletion is more disruptive.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-06-28 15:05:21 | Re: pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2011-06-28 14:52:58 | Re: pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-06-28 15:05:21 | Re: pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2011-06-28 15:00:54 | Re: [v9.2] Fix leaky-view problem, part 1 |