| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | SSI tuning points |
| Date: | 2011-06-17 21:50:11 |
| Message-ID: | 4DFB85C3020000250003E883@gw.wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
The attached patch addresses one of the open non-blockers for beta3.
These are tuning points which emerged in testing. The first is more
likely to be helpful. The second may be very important in a few
types of transaction mixes, but I threw in a lot of weasel words and
qualifiers because someone could easily try this to bring down the
transaction retry rate, but suffer a net loss in throughput because
less efficient plans could be chosen. I hope I made that point in a
reasonable fashion, although I'm certainly open to suggestions for
better wording.
-Kevin
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| ssi-tuning-1.patch | text/plain | 1.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joseph Adams | 2011-06-17 22:06:58 | Re: Another swing at JSON |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-06-17 21:36:22 | Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe |