Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch

On 06/06/2011 04:43 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie jun 03 09:17:08 -0400 2011:
>>> I've now spent enough time working on this issue now to be convinced
>>> that the approach has merit, if we can work out the kinks. I'll start
>>> with some performance numbers.
>>
>> I hereby recommend that people with patches such as this one while on
>> the last weeks till release should refrain from posting them until the
>> release has actually taken place.
>
> %(at)#!
>
> Next time I'll be sure to only post my patches during beta if they suck.
>

I think Alvaro's point isn't directed at you Robert but at the idea that
this should be applied to 9.1.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579