Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "Stephen Frost" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Dimitri Fontaine" <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
Date: 2011-06-06 20:14:25
Message-ID: 4DECEED1020000250003E21D@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:

> if people really want this in, then we need to figure out what the
> new schedule is going to be.

I suggest June, 2012. That way we can get a whole bunch more really
cool patches in, and the users won't have to wait for 9.2 to get
them.

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2011-06-06 20:19:48 Re: contrib/citext versus collations
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-06-06 20:14:00 contrib/citext versus collations