Re: Isolation checks under MSVC

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Isolation checks under MSVC
Date: 2011-05-23 12:56:18
Message-ID: 4DDA5972.5080605@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/16/2011 04:09 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 06:14, Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> I've committed a bunch of changes both in the Postgres code and the
>> buildfarm code to enable running the isolation checks under MSVC. There's
>> one hurdle that I haven't overcome: the code tries to call
>> "./isolationtester" and Windows barfs on it. I think we need to remove that
>> way of doing things, and instead user a full path for such commands like we
>> do elsewhere.
> That seems like the reasonable way to fix it, yes.

It turns out that the real problem was that I'd put a spurious
underscore in the name of the .exe in the MSVC build. That's been fixed
now and this is all working.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aidan Van Dyk 2011-05-23 13:32:55 Re: SSI predicate locking on heap -- tuple or row?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-05-23 12:26:27 Re: [BUGS] BUG #6034: pg_upgrade fails when it should not.