| From: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(dot)berkus(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? |
| Date: | 2011-05-06 18:19:22 |
| Message-ID: | 4DC43BAA.4020502@timbira.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Em 06-05-2011 14:55, Christopher Browne escreveu:
> The "improvement"
> would come from drawing contrib a bit closer to core, and encouraging
> packagers (dpkg, rpm, ports) to fold contrib into "base" rather than
> separating it. I'm sure that would get some pushback, though.
>
I'm in favor of find out what are the popular extensions and make them into
"base"; the other ones could be moved to PGXN.
--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2011-05-06 18:29:24 | Re: [CORE] list of members for CA nonprofit |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-05-06 18:06:00 | Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? |