Re: branching for 9.2devel

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Joshua Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>,"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: branching for 9.2devel
Date: 2011-05-01 19:34:34
Message-ID: 4DBD6F7A020000250003D0CE@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:

> Generally the last week only has 1-3 patches open

The last CF I managed the end of the third week looked like this:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-08/msg00334.php

That is, we had 15 patches still pending out of 72 submitted:

9 ready for committer
1 waiting on author
5 needing review

If you want to view it as a *commit* fest, that is really 15 to go.
If you're viewing it as a *review* fest, those six broke down:

3 were patches submitted by committers (1 of which was WIP)
1 other was WIP
1 was down to tweaking docs
1 got a review the next day, showing it wasn't ready

So we either need to markedly increase the pace of CFs (which is
hard without more reviewers unless we provide "brisker" review and
kick things back a lot faster) or we need to stop thinking that the
goal is to get them *committed* during the CommitFest; but I thought
that was kinda the point.

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-05-01 19:57:21 Re: branching for 9.2devel
Previous Message Joshua Berkus 2011-05-01 19:18:15 Re: Changing the continuation-line prompt in psql?