Re: Proposal - asynchronous functions

From: Sim Zacks <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal - asynchronous functions
Date: 2011-04-26 13:17:48
Message-ID: 4DB6C5FC.5010704@compulab.co.il
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 04/26/2011 03:15 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Sim Zacks<sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il> wrote:
>> Asynchronous functions
>>
>> *Problem*
>> Postgresql does not have support for asynchronous function calls.
> Well, there is asynchronous support from the client of course. Thus
> you can set up a asynchronous call back to the database with dblink.
> There is some discussion about formalizing this feature -- you might
> want to read up on autonomous transactions and how they might be used
> to do what you are proposing.
>
> merlin
I am looking for specifically server support and not client support.
Part of the proposal is that if the client goes away, it will still
continue to finish.

Sim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Radosław Smogura 2011-04-26 13:21:05 Re: Improving the memory allocator
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-04-26 13:06:45 Re: Proposal - asynchronous functions