Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1
Date: 2011-04-19 12:07:41
Message-ID: 4DAD7B0D.4000105@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 04/19/2011 05:15 AM, Laurent Laborde wrote:
> 2 kingston V+100 500GB
>

Thanks for the performance report. The V+100 is based on a Toshiba
T6UG1XBG controller, and it doesn't have any durable cache from either a
battery or capacitor. As such, putting a database on that drive is very
risky. You can expect the database to be corrupted during an unusual
power outage event. See http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reliable_Writes
for more information.

At this point most people considering one of Kingston's drives for a
database would be better off getting an Intel 320 series drive, which is
around the same price but doesn't have this issue.

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
"PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurent Laborde 2011-04-19 12:36:42 Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1
Previous Message Laurent Laborde 2011-04-19 09:28:45 Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1