Re: [JDBC] JDBC connections to 9.1

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Steve Singer <ssinger(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [JDBC] JDBC connections to 9.1
Date: 2011-04-18 16:35:56
Message-ID: 4DAC686C.1040207@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

On 04/18/2011 11:25 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> What concerns me most is that (assuming my dates are right) the JDBC driver has been
>> broken for 11 days and no one noticed. This would lead me to believe
>> that there is no JDBC build server. What would it take to set one up?
> +1 for doing something along that line.
>
>

All you'd need to do is write a step for a buildfarm animal to fetch the
JDBC driver and run some tests, and run it in a buildfarm client
somewhere. The server code is quite agnostic about the steps that are
reported on.

IOW in addition to a running buildfarm member you need to write a small
amount (< 100 lines, possibly much less) of perl code.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jesper Krogh 2011-04-18 16:38:58 Re: Evaluation of secondary sort key.
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-04-18 16:33:13 Re: WIP: Allow SQL-language functions to reference parameters by parameter name

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Fowler 2011-04-18 16:40:49 Re: [JDBC] JDBC connections to 9.1
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-04-18 16:12:15 Re: [JDBC] JDBC connections to 9.1