Re: Replication server timeout patch

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replication server timeout patch
Date: 2011-03-30 08:03:33
Message-ID: 4D92E3D5.3070604@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 30.03.2011 10:58, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> + A value of zero means wait forever. This parameter can only be set in
>
> The first sentence sounds misleading. Even if you set the parameter to zero,
> replication connections can be terminated because of keepalive or socket error.

Hmm, should I change it back to "A value of zero disables the timeout" ?
Any better suggestions?

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2011-03-30 08:08:22 Re: Replication server timeout patch
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2011-03-30 07:58:25 Re: Replication server timeout patch