Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
> it would be done in a transaction otherwise what is the point ?
That's a fair question. A batch will almost always run faster if
done as a single transaction which either runs in its entirety or
fails in its entirety. What is the reason for wanting to use batch
processing if not for speed? I think we need to see a reasonable
use case from someone advocating this change in order to justify it.
(Note: "It works in MySQL" won't cut it.)
-Kevin