| From: | Joseph Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: making write location work (was: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication) |
| Date: | 2011-03-24 15:45:58 |
| Message-ID: | 4D8B6736.7070600@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/24/11 8:16 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Robert Haas wrote:
>
>>> At least as I understand it, it's not our project policy to carry
>>> around code that doesn't accomplish anything useful. I have no
>>> objection to keeping the field; I simply think that if we're
>>> going to have it, we should make it work
>
>> What a stupid conversation.
>
> That hardly seems like a convincing response. Adding a column to a
> view when the column contains meaninful values seems less likely to
> break things than initially adding it with a different value,
> identical to another column, and then changing the semantics.
>
> +1 for either dropping it or making it work.
+1
Joe
--
Joe Conway
credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2011-03-24 16:07:40 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document the all-balls IPv6 address. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-03-24 15:05:57 | Re: Re: making write location work (was: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication) |