Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Sync Rep and shutdown Re: Sync Rep v19

From: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sync Rep and shutdown Re: Sync Rep v19
Date: 2011-03-20 15:03:04
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2011-03-20 05:44, Robert Haas wrote:
> Hmm, I'm not going to be able to reproduce this here, and my test
> setup didn't show a clear regression.  I can try beating on it some
> more, but...  Any chance you could rerun your test with the latest
> master-branch code, and perhaps also with the patch I proposed
> upthread to remove a branch from the section protection by
> SyncRepLock?  I can't really tell from reading the emails you linked
> what was responsible for the slowdowns and speedups, and it is unclear
> to me how much impact my recent changes actually had.
No problem. Could you tell me the name of the "remove a branch from the 
section protection by SyncRepLock" ? patch, or perhaps a message-link? 
Upthread I see sync-standbys-defined-rearrangement.patch but also two 

Yeb Havinga

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2011-03-20 15:18:06
Subject: Re: foreign keys for array/period contains relationships
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-03-20 11:58:32
Subject: Re: VACUUM FULL deadlock with backend startup

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group