| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: VACUUM FULL deadlock with backend startup |
| Date: | 2011-03-20 11:58:32 |
| Message-ID: | 07143368-BC71-4ACB-8B58-CF98BA515517@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mar 20, 2011, at 2:24 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Nikhil Sontakke
>> <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Not really a performance issue AFAICS. If the relcache init file exists,
>>> then the phase2 of the catalog cache which eventually calls the above code
>>> path is avoided.
>
>> Oh, that doesn't sound so bad, then.
>
> I want to take a closer look at this one because I thought I'd covered
> all those issues in the last go-round.
Go for it.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yeb Havinga | 2011-03-20 15:03:04 | Re: Sync Rep and shutdown Re: Sync Rep v19 |
| Previous Message | Nicolas Barbier | 2011-03-20 10:11:09 | Re: I am confused after reading codes of PostgreSQL three week |