Re: disposition of remaining patches

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: disposition of remaining patches
Date: 2011-02-26 01:21:50
Message-ID: 4D6855AE.4000401@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/25/11 4:57 PM, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 15:44 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Hmmm, I don't follow this. The user can only disable syncrep for their
>> own transactions. If they don't care about the persistence of their
>> transaction post-failover, why should the DBA care?
>
> I think that's the difference between failover and switchover, right? At
> least Slony makes such a distinction, as well.

Yeah. Actually, what would be even simpler and more to the point would
be a command that says "flush all transactions from Server A to Server
B, then fail over".

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Farina 2011-02-26 01:32:03 Re: Sync Rep v17
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2011-02-26 00:57:03 Re: disposition of remaining patches