Re: [Mingw-users] mingw64

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: MinGW Users List <mingw-users(at)lists(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "mingw-w64-public(at)lists(dot)sourceforge(dot)net" <mingw-w64-public(at)lists(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Mingw-users] mingw64
Date: 2011-02-14 00:06:27
Message-ID: 4D587203.5030008@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/12/2011 05:10 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello, and sorry for the delay,
>
> * Peter Rosin wrote on Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 02:26:24PM CET:
>> Or is plain 'ar' used somewhere instead of 'x86_64-w64-mingw32-ar'?
> Automake outputs 'AR = ar' in Makefile.in for rules creating old
> libraries iff neither AC_PROG_LIBTOOL nor another method to define
> AR correctly is used in configure.ac.
>
> So this issue concerns packages using Automake but not using Libtool.
>
> I figured with AM_PROG_AR eventually being needed anyway that would fix
> this in one go ...
>
> A good workaround, as already mentioned, is to use this in configure.ac:
> AC_CHECK_TOOL([AR], [ar], [false])
>

This was sorted out some time ago.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-02-14 00:18:33 Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2011-02-13 22:52:22 Re: Why we don't want hints