Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Noah Misch" <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: "Itagaki Takahiro" <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp>,<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw
Date: 2011-02-11 16:31:08
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
>> From a functional and code structure perspective, I find this
>> ready to commit. (I assume you'll drop the XXX: indent only
>> comments on commit.) Kevin, did you want to do that performance
>> testing you spoke of?
> OK, so is this Ready for Committer, or we're still working on it?

I can run some benchmarks to compare COPY statements with and
without the patch this weekend. Noah, does it make more sense to do
that with just the copy_export-20110209.patch patch file applied, or
in combination with some other FDW patch(es)?


In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-02-11 16:31:16 Re: multiset patch review
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-02-11 16:26:51 Re: Add support for logging the current role